The Tea Party is Here to Stay

by Diane Rufino, July 29, 2011

It is said that the Tea Party movement started with a rant by Rick Santelli, CNBC correspondent, on the trading floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on Feb. 19, 2009 but the truth is that it started long before that.

The Tea Party movement started over 200 years ago, on December 16, 1773, with a simple act of civil disobedience in rejection of a small tax on tea – “a 3 pence.”  On that evening, approximately 100 “radicals” from Boston, members of a secret organization of American Patriots called the Sons of Liberty, dressed up as Mohawk Indians, boarded three East India Company ships, and dumped 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor.  The Boston Tea Party would have as a direct consequence (albeit in 1775) the firing of the first shots of the Revolutionary War…. and then, our independence from a tyrannical government.

Just as John Adams commented that the American Revolution was in the hearts and minds of the colonists even before a drop of blood was spilled at Lexington – “The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments of their duties and obligations. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution” – our current (tax and spend) revolution has been in the hearts and minds of ordinary hardworking folks even before Barack Obama took office.

Conservative voters were already questioning why the government was bailing out banks  (Bush signed a $700 billion plan to bail out banks), why billions of dollars of their hard-earned tax money was  being spent on enlarging government programs, and why politicians were willingly saddling their children with government debt.

Then when Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, he quickly appointed people (czars) like Larry Summer and Tim Geithner to his team who were all seen as people who were part of the problem  rather than capable of offering solutions.  Stephanie Jasky, a paralegal from Detroit, Michigan, chatted: “We were hemorrhaging money.  I was looking for answers – I wanted to know what had happened. The more I looked the more it became clear to me that the problem was our government, that the government had become the criminal.” Jasky was one of those citizens who took up the idea of sending her elected officials in the US Congress tea bags as a form of protest. She loved the idea. She bought a box of tea bags and sent one to every member of Congress.  She said: “All these bailouts and stimulus packages — it was taking our money and spending it without our permission. Taxation without Representation.  Isn’t that what the Revolutionary War was all about?  Doesn’t anyone remember King George?”

On February 15, 2009, a young mother named Keli Carender, blogging under the name “Liberty Belle,” spread the word about a grass-roots protest she was organizing in Seattle to express outrage over the passage of the trillion-dollar Stimulus Bill (aka, “The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act”; aka, the “Porkulus” Bill; aka, the “Generational Theft Act of 2009″).   She was enraged that such a bill passed Congress and especially without much discussion or opposition by Republicans.  It was the first time she did any kind of political organizing.   She was simply a conservative mother who blogged and never envisioned herself jumping into any political arena.   Amazingly, she organized the event in a few days all on her own by reaching out on the Internet, contacting her local talk radio station, and talking to anyone who would listen.

Also in February, local radio host Leland Conway in Kentucky called on his listeners to send pork rinds to liberal NY Senator Chuck Schumer. Conway’s idea was motivated by Schumer’s arrogant statement that only the “chattering classes” – the middle class – cared about the “teeny, tiny” pork amendments in the Generational Theft Act.  In response to his radio plea, a mountain of 1,500 bags of pork rinds poured into the station and on February 16, they were shipped to Schumer.

On February 18, 500 fed-up taxpayers showed up in Mesa, AZ to protest President Obama’s plans to expand the government’s mortgage entitlement program.  (Think about what happened with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac).

On February 19, ordinary citizen Amanda Grosserode e-mailed that she was organizing a tax protest in Overland Park, KS the following weekend.  More than 400 people showed up in freezing cold weather to protest Rep. Dennis Moore’s vote for the stimulus bill.  And also on that same day, CNBC’s Rick Santelli issued his now-famous rant over Obama’s plans for mortgage entitlement and the need for a Chicago “Tea Party.”  Santelli accused the Obama administration of “promoting bad behavior” and subsidizing mortgages to people who didn’t deserve them in the first place.   After all, there is no RIGHT in this country to own a home.  But Democrats are in the business of finding new rights and new entitlements.

Santelli gave a voice and even a passion to what the Tea Party movement would become….  a frustration with government and its policies of entitlement and fiscal irresponsibility.  Here are the words of that rant: RICK SANTELLI:  The government is promoting bad behavior…..  You know, the new administration’s big on computers and technology…   How about this, President and new administration?  Why don’t you put up a website to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages; or would we like to at least buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people that might have a chance to actually prosper down the road, and reward people that could carry the water instead of drink the water?  This is America!  How many of you people want to pay for your neighbor’s mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can’t pay their bills?  Raise your hand.

(Whistling, Cheering.People booing Obama)

SANTELLI:  President Obama, are you listening?

RANDOM TRADER:  How ’bout we all stop paying our mortgage?

SANTELLI:  You know, Cuba used to have mansions and a relatively decent economy. They moved from the individual to the collective. Now, they’re driving ’54 Chevys, which is probably the last great car to come out of Detroit.

KERNEN:  Hey Rick, how about the notion that you can go down to 2% on the mortgage…

SANTELLI:  You could go down to -2%.  And they can’t afford the house.

JOE KERNEN:   So why are they in the house?  Why are we trying to keep them in the house?

SANTELLI:   We’re thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July.  All you capitalists that want to show up to Lake Michigan, I’m gonna start organizing.

(Whistling, cheering)

WILBUR ROSS:  Rick, I congratulate you on your new incarnation as a revolutionary leader.

SANTELLI:  Somebody needs one.  I’ll tell you what, if you read our Founding Fathers, people like Benjamin Franklin and Jefferson,… What we’re doing in this country now is making them roll over in their graves.

Perhaps Santelli was referring to a warning by James Madison: “The people of the U.S. owe their Independence and their liberty to the wisdom of descrying in the minute tax of 3 pence on tea, the magnitude of the evil comprised in the precedent. Let them exert the same wisdom, in watching against every evil lurking under plausible disguises, and growing up from small beginnings.”

For too long, Americans have not been watching.

Within 10 days of Santelli’s rant, on February 27, the first Tea Party rally was held in Washington, Chicago and other cities across the US.  The Tea Party movement and Tea Party phenomenon had been born.

Lest we forget what the Tea Party stands for and who itself makes up this informal group of grassroots “radicals,” consider how Mark Alexander, of the Patriot Post, summed it up in 2010.  He wrote:

“We are American Patriots, defenders of First Principles and Essential Liberty.

We are Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen and public servants standing in harm’s way at home and around the world, who are loyal, first and foremost, to our revered oath to “support and defend” our Constitution.

We are grassroots leaders and local, state and national officeholders who, likewise, honor our sacred oath.

We are mothers, fathers and other family members nurturing the next generation of young Patriots. We are farmers, craftsmen, tradesmen and industrial producers. We are small business owners, service providers and professionals in medicine and law. We are employees and employers. We are in ministry at home and missionaries abroad. We are students and professors at colleges and universities – often standing alone in such institutions for what is good and right.

We are consumers and taxpayers.   We are voters.

We are Patriot sons and daughters from all walks of life, heirs to the blessings of Liberty bequeathed to us at great personal cost by our Patriot forebearers, confirmed in the opinion that it is our duty to God and Country to extend that blessing to our posterity, and avowed upon our sacred honor to that end. We are vigilant, strong, prepared and faithful.

We are not defined by race, creed, ethnicity, religion, wealth, education or political affiliation, but by our devotion to our Creator, and the liberty He has entrusted to us, one and all.”

The Tea Party is not a political party.  It is not organized around a national platform and handed down for its members to follow.  Rather, it’s a bottoms-up, grassroots organization dictated by the concerns of taxpayers and other patriots who hold certain principles as non-negotiable.

“Those principles include, first and foremost, advocating for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and the promotion of free enterprise, national defense, and traditional American values.”

And the Tea Party is definitely here to stay. References:

Michele Malkin, “Tax Day Tea Party Cheat Sheet:  How it All Started, ” April 15, 2009.  Referenced at:  http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/15/a-tax-day-tea-party-cheat-sheet-how-it-all-started/

Ed Pilkington, “How the Tea Party Began,” Oct. 5, 2010.  Referenced at:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/05/us-midterm-elections-2010-tea-party-movement

Santelli’s Rant –  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k&feature=player_embedded

Mark Alexander, “The Tea Party Movement, ” The Patriot Post, June 24, 2010.  Referenced at:  http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2010/06/24/the-tea-party-movement/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s